🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration is no longer a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that authorities allow or withhold at their discretion. This represents the implication of proposed measures that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would dictate the timing and location protests can occur, with possible imprisonment for those who defy these limitations.

Erosion of Democratic Rights

Previous governments had already weakened this essential right: the former Conservative government had given law enforcement extensive new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "serious and unjustified limitations" on civil liberties. Taken together, these incremental assaults on liberty have effectively eliminated the hard-won right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Tragedy to Justify Suppression

The most recent restrictive measures are being defended by citing last week's terrible antisemitic assault on a Manchester Islamic center. We can all agree on widespread consensus that the safety of British Jews must be protected. However, using this atrocity as a pretext to stifle opposition is not only unrelated to that responsibility but distorts it.

"If you can't draw the line at genocide, you probably cannot establish limits at democratic principles," commented a prominent American author, a statement that rings true for the present administration.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's rich history of protest and activism against racism and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these historical demonstrators were branded as extremists in their time, even while they were advocating the rights of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In today's complex situation, here's what's actually occurring: The Israeli government – a foreign state – is committing what United Nations investigations have characterized as genocide. Its military actions have led the International Criminal Court to issue legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

International popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of citizens think Israel has probably committed international law violations. Most people would endorse a complete ban on arms sales to the state, and back the detention of the Israeli leader.

Suppressing Opposition

Having largely lost the public debate, Israel's supporters are now seizing on a despicable antisemitic crime to attempt to silence a mass movement against a ethical disaster. The British government seems involved in this attempt. Government officials have failed to implement extensive restrictions on Israel and have allowed weapon shipments to continue.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been characterized as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these demonstrators until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to take action.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish heritage with the policies of the Israeli state is not only cynical but also dangerous. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, accepted by the British government and many organizations, has been appropriately challenged for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a situation where law enforcement can propose that protests criticizing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" support antisemitism. Similarly, political figures have stated that recognition of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "complicit" in alleged abuse faced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the horrific toll from 24 months of daily atrocities that have claimed tens of thousands of lives. British politicians and news organizations have hardly hidden the limited value they attach to Palestinian life. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of discrimination in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already crossed a dangerous boundary by banning a specific activist group, a non-violent, anti-genocide direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British protesters have been arrested, primarily for holding signs against mass killing and endorsing the banned organization. Many of those arrested are pensioners; among them a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's not difficult to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a ex-political leader implied that some were "linked with" other nations, while the current president characterized such protests as anti-Jewish. In taking these actions, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be given extensive authority to control opposition. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our forebears fought, endured hardship and died to secure our freedoms. We may ultimately rue how easily we allowed them to slip away.